I dream of running an ultra marathon. I love to run single track technical trails, I get so in the zone that I forget I am even running. Unfortunately at this point in time my injuries have all but fettered my ability to even train for an ultra. Right now, I have to keep my total mileage under 30 miles a week and less than 7 miles a run to keep the tendon pain in my foot/ankle from shutting me down from running all together. I have tried everything I could get my hands on to help with the pain: yoga, orthotics, compression socks, new shoes, etc. All have helped to a degree but I am still looking for the magic tool to get me off the ground and running. So I was excited when I started seeing some of my favorite ultra runners trying out a new shoe on the market the Hoka One One. It is an uber cushioned shoe that made adrenaline race through my body when I first saw it and thought that it could be exactly what I needed. It is claimed to have three times the cushion of an ordinary running shoe and yet it is still super light weight. Most people claim if feels like running on a cloud and that it has allowed many people to extended their mileage without impacting their body. They do look a little silly, like clown shoes, but hey if they do the trick I couldn't care less. The only thing that held me back was the thought of dropping $170 on a pair of shoes, especially without being able to try them on first to see if they would actually even work for me.
So when I was out West on a trip I stopped by one of the very few stores in the U.S. that actually carry this new shoe line. I tried on the Mafate (trail) and the Bondi B (road) and was totally amazed at how great it was to run in them at the store. They felt like I was running on marshmallows that would spring me forward and made it feel like I had zero ground impact. They didn't feel like a beefy over-engineered shoe, but actually made my foot feel like I was running barefoot on a marshmallow cloud. I only got to play with them for about ten minutes at the store at this point in time.
I was leaning towards the Bondi B mainly because here in central NJ it really takes a lot of effort to get to a trail to run, so most of my running is a mix of road and trail. The Mafate's cleats were very aggressive and I didn't think they would work so well on the road. The salesman at the store told me Hoka had come out with a new shoe that was a mix between the Mafate and the Bondi B, it was called the Stinson B/Combo XT. He didn't have any in stock but told me to look online and that I might be able to snag a pair.
So I went online and found a pair of the Stinsons in my size and promptly ordered them. I took the salesman's advice and order a half size larger than what I normally wear, since the shoe supposedly runs small.
The shoes arrived and I was very glad I ordered the half size larger, they fit perfectly. They even fit very well with my custom orthotics, which is a rare thing in the running shoe world from my experience. I took them for a short jog and they felt great just like they did in the store, but I did notice that I didn't feel as stable in them when running across uneven ground. I wrote this off as my just not being use to them and that I would give them a long run to see how things went.
The next day I decided to take them on a six plus mile run, I inserted my orthotics and laced them up and away we went. The first mile flew by and I felt great, but still a little unstable. At mile two I started to get some light foot pain that I attributed to new shoes needing to be broken in. However at the three mile mark I was crippled with foot pain. The tendon on the outside of my foot used for stabilizing the foot/ankle was on fire much to my dismay. I stopped and took stock of my situation, realizing that I was already three miles away from home and that I needed to get back. So I decided to experiment and took my orthotics out to see if were the cause of the stability problems I was having in the shoe. This seemed to help a little bit, but I still noticed it felt like I was close to twisting both my ankles any time the ground was not level underfoot. During the long walk/jog home I studied how my feet were landing in the shoes and I noticed that neither foot was landing exactly the same with each step. Instead the shoe seemed to magnify how my ankle/foot would rotate in and out depending on the terrain. I am a neutral runner with high arches and had not experienced anything like this before. I almost started to wonder if I really need stability shoes given how much pronation and supination I was experiencing with each step. Needles to say the thought of returning them really killed the new shoe buzz. I decided, not to be hasty and that I would need to give them a few more chances before writing them off.
The next day I decided to try them again, but as I got out of bed that morning I could barely walk, the tendon pain was still there. I decided to take it easy and gave my feet a couple of days off. By the third day I was feeling good and gave them another shot, needless to say I was back in pain within 200 meters of easy jogging. This cycle of trying them on and doing a quick jog went on for a week or two, before I finally decided that for some reason they were not going to work for me. I got hold of the group who I had purchased them from and they took them back with no questions asked, even with the miles I had put on them. This was a bittersweet moment, since I was torn with the decision of exchanging them for the Bondi B road model. However the store rep didn't seem to think that there was a difference in the shoe other than the tread pattern and that it would probably not help.
So where does that leave me now? I have no idea, all the shoes I have tried on since the Hokas seem ordinary and I am hankering for the feeling of floating on marshmallows. I really want the shoes to work for me, especially since I have not read a review online that is anything less than extraordinary. No one seems to have mentioned any stability problems in the shoe, or given any hint as to why I may have struggled with it. I still have a nagging thought in my brain that I should give the Bondi B's a try to see if they would be better. However, since I don't seem to be able to see any documentation proving it is not the exact same sole/footbed on the shoe I haven't pulled the trigger.
Until then, the search continues.
So when I was out West on a trip I stopped by one of the very few stores in the U.S. that actually carry this new shoe line. I tried on the Mafate (trail) and the Bondi B (road) and was totally amazed at how great it was to run in them at the store. They felt like I was running on marshmallows that would spring me forward and made it feel like I had zero ground impact. They didn't feel like a beefy over-engineered shoe, but actually made my foot feel like I was running barefoot on a marshmallow cloud. I only got to play with them for about ten minutes at the store at this point in time.
I was leaning towards the Bondi B mainly because here in central NJ it really takes a lot of effort to get to a trail to run, so most of my running is a mix of road and trail. The Mafate's cleats were very aggressive and I didn't think they would work so well on the road. The salesman at the store told me Hoka had come out with a new shoe that was a mix between the Mafate and the Bondi B, it was called the Stinson B/Combo XT. He didn't have any in stock but told me to look online and that I might be able to snag a pair.
So I went online and found a pair of the Stinsons in my size and promptly ordered them. I took the salesman's advice and order a half size larger than what I normally wear, since the shoe supposedly runs small.
The shoes arrived and I was very glad I ordered the half size larger, they fit perfectly. They even fit very well with my custom orthotics, which is a rare thing in the running shoe world from my experience. I took them for a short jog and they felt great just like they did in the store, but I did notice that I didn't feel as stable in them when running across uneven ground. I wrote this off as my just not being use to them and that I would give them a long run to see how things went.
The next day I decided to take them on a six plus mile run, I inserted my orthotics and laced them up and away we went. The first mile flew by and I felt great, but still a little unstable. At mile two I started to get some light foot pain that I attributed to new shoes needing to be broken in. However at the three mile mark I was crippled with foot pain. The tendon on the outside of my foot used for stabilizing the foot/ankle was on fire much to my dismay. I stopped and took stock of my situation, realizing that I was already three miles away from home and that I needed to get back. So I decided to experiment and took my orthotics out to see if were the cause of the stability problems I was having in the shoe. This seemed to help a little bit, but I still noticed it felt like I was close to twisting both my ankles any time the ground was not level underfoot. During the long walk/jog home I studied how my feet were landing in the shoes and I noticed that neither foot was landing exactly the same with each step. Instead the shoe seemed to magnify how my ankle/foot would rotate in and out depending on the terrain. I am a neutral runner with high arches and had not experienced anything like this before. I almost started to wonder if I really need stability shoes given how much pronation and supination I was experiencing with each step. Needles to say the thought of returning them really killed the new shoe buzz. I decided, not to be hasty and that I would need to give them a few more chances before writing them off.
The next day I decided to try them again, but as I got out of bed that morning I could barely walk, the tendon pain was still there. I decided to take it easy and gave my feet a couple of days off. By the third day I was feeling good and gave them another shot, needless to say I was back in pain within 200 meters of easy jogging. This cycle of trying them on and doing a quick jog went on for a week or two, before I finally decided that for some reason they were not going to work for me. I got hold of the group who I had purchased them from and they took them back with no questions asked, even with the miles I had put on them. This was a bittersweet moment, since I was torn with the decision of exchanging them for the Bondi B road model. However the store rep didn't seem to think that there was a difference in the shoe other than the tread pattern and that it would probably not help.
So where does that leave me now? I have no idea, all the shoes I have tried on since the Hokas seem ordinary and I am hankering for the feeling of floating on marshmallows. I really want the shoes to work for me, especially since I have not read a review online that is anything less than extraordinary. No one seems to have mentioned any stability problems in the shoe, or given any hint as to why I may have struggled with it. I still have a nagging thought in my brain that I should give the Bondi B's a try to see if they would be better. However, since I don't seem to be able to see any documentation proving it is not the exact same sole/footbed on the shoe I haven't pulled the trigger.
Until then, the search continues.

















